Legal Opinion · Dissent

Weason v. Colorado Court of Appeals

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 26, 1987No. 86SA228Published

1Dissent

ERICKSON, JUSTICE,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent. In my view, the court of appeals did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to file a notice of appeal out of time, and the extraordinary relief of mandamus should not be granted where the defendant has an adequate remedy under Crim.P. 35(c).

I

A defendant’s failure to comply with C.A.R. 4 and C.A.R. 26(b) deprives the appellate court of jurisdiction and precludes review of the defendant’s conviction. People v. Silvola, 198 Colo. 228, 597 P.2d 583 *739(1979); People v. Allen, 182 Colo. 395, 513 P.2d 1060 (1973). Widener v.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gramiger v. CrowleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. Herbert Eugene Blanchard v. Lou v. Brewer, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  3. Beaver Meadows v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  4. Wainwright v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Ivie Clay, a Minor v. Director, Juvenile Division, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API