Legal Opinion

Occidental Life Insurance v. Blume

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1965No. 37384PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

This appeal involves conflicting claims to an insurance refund paid into court by the plaintiff in interpleader, Occidental Life Insurance Company of California (hereafter referred to as Occidental).

Claimants are the trustees of Washington Teamsters Welfare Trust (hereafter referred to as Washington Trust, and Washington Trustees) and trustees of Puget Sound and Inland Empire Teamsters Health and Welfare Plan (hereafter referred to as Puget Trust, and Puget Trustees). The two groups made conflicting claims to a $163,513 experience rating refund Occidental had determined and was prepared to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Monroe v. WinnWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Old National Bank & Union Trust Co. v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Del Veccio v. HoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. PEOPLES NAT. BK. OF WN. IN SEATTLE v. JarvisWashington Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Austin v. U.S. BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  3. Estate of Paxton v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  4. Alaska State Employees Ass'n v. Alaska Public Employees Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Baldus v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API