Legal Opinion
Clark v. Sallaska
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 30, 1918No. 9235PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error from County Court, Custer County; Osear E. Houston, Judge. Action by J. J. Sallaska against J. Johnson and H. H. Clark. Judgment against defendants. and defendant II. H. Clark brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
STEWART, C.
The plaintiff brought action against the defendant on two promissory notes made by the defendant J. Johnson, payable to the order of the defendant H. H. Clark, and by the payee transferred after maturity to the plaintiff, alleging as a cause of action against the payee :
“That at the time of the sale and transfer of said notes by said H. H. Clark to this plaintiff, the said H. H. Clark represented to this plaintiff that there was absolutely nothing wrong with the said notes, and that there were no defects or infirmities about them, nor any equities existing between the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Grimes v. TaitSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Shaffer v. GovreauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oklahoma City v. SheldonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Scott v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Bailey v. Plumbers Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926