Crossman v. Griggs
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.
Before May 15, 1894, the two plaintiffs, Lemuel and Alfred H. Crossman, together with the defendant Griggs and *276one George H. Bent, were copartners in the business of manufacturing and selling water crackers.' On or about May 15, 1894, the plaintiffs conveyed and assigned to Griggs their interest in the real and personal property of the firm, including the good will of the business and the right to use the name “G. H. Bent & Co.” in connection therewith. Bent made a similar, conveyance and assignment about the same time. The amount due the plaintiffs for this conveyance and assignment was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chadwick v. CovellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Moore v. RawsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Messer v. FadettesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Covell v. ChadwickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Old Colony Trust Co. v. Great White Spirit Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- George G. Fox Co. v. GlynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Carroll v. Duluth Superior Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Allen v. Walker & GibsonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1916
- Cloverleaf Restaurants, Inc. v. LenihanOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.