Legal Opinion

Hotel Richmond Inc. v. Wilkinson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 12, 1945No. 30935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

An innkeeper is not an insurer of his guests' safety. The duty of an innkeeper is to exercise ordinary care in furnishing to his patrons such premises as are reasonably safe. It is likewise the duty of the patrons to exercise ordinary care for their own safety.

DECIDED OCTOBER 12, 1945.

M. A. Wilkinson Jr., sued Hotel Richmond Inc., and recovered damages for an alleged injury received as a paying guest of the defendant. In the early evening, it was alleged, that the plaintiff, after being assigned to his room, took a bath, dressed, left the hotel, had dinner, attended a picture show, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holloman v. Henry Grady Hotel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Irwin v. TorbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  2. Hillinghorst v. Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Sarno v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  4. Palagano v. Georgian Terrace Hotel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. Truett v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API