Legal Opinion

People v. Thingvold

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 22, 1989No. 2—88—0410PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McLAREN

Defendant, Raymond Thingvold, was charged by information with the offense of solicitation (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 38, par. 8—1). He allegedly solicited George Nalan over a period of time to arrange the murder of defendant’s wife, Barbara Thingvold. He was found guilty and sentenced to a prison term of 25 years.

Defendant initially attacks the sufficiency of the information under which he was charged, contending that it failed to properly allege that the offense occurred within the applicable statute-of-limitations period or to adequately plead an exception to the statute. We disagree.

A…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. RomeroIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Daley v. HettIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. StraitIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. The PEOPLE v. CarterIllinois Supreme Court · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. ThingvoldIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. JoyceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  4. People v. JoyceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. People v. JoyceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API