Legal Opinion
LOMBARD MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. Johannessen
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 2, 2010No. Civil Action 10cv10995-NGPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
GERTNER, District Judge:
Lombard Medical Technologies, Inc. (“Lombard”) is seeking a preliminary injunction to prohibit its former employees, Nils Johannessen and Thomas Sassler, from working for its competitor, TriVascular Inc., in violation of their non-competition agreements. I find that Lombard has successfully demonstrated a likelihood of success on the breach of contract claim and that without injunctive relief, it will suffer irreparable harm. Accordingly, its motion for a preliminary injunction (document # 2) is GRANTED IN…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ticketmaster-New York, Inc. v. Joseph M. AliotoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Richard A. Daynard v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, P.A. Ronald L. Motley, Scruggs, Millette, Bozeman & Dent P.A. Richard F. ScruggsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Jay A. Pritzker v. Bob YariCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Get in Shape Franchise, Inc. v. TFL Fishers, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- Corporate Technologies, Inc. v. HarnettDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Aspect Software, Inc. v. BarnettDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Partylite Gifts, Inc. v. MacMillanDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2012
- HCC Specialty Underwriters, Inc. v. WoodburyDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.