Legal Opinion

Lund v. City of Fall River

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 22, 2013No. 12-1758PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOUTER, Associate Justice.

Appellant, Gary Lund, contends that the City of Fall River’s zoning ordinances violate the First Amendment by preventing him from opening an adult entertainment establishment on land zoned industrial without providing an adequate opportunity elsewhere. The district court rejected his claim, and we affirm.

I

By the terms of a Fall River ordinance, intending providers of adult entertainment must obtain a “special permit,” see Revised Code of Ordinances of the City of Fall River, Mass., Rev. Ordinances § 86-85, which may be granted only if the applicant meets a variety of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. James L. McCoy Administrator of the Electrical Workers Trust Funds, Etc. v. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. National Amusements, Inc. v. Town of DedhamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  4. City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Steamship Clerks Union, Local 1066Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maages Auditorium v. Prince George's CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
  2. Phantom Ventures LLC v. DepriestDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
  3. Vaqueria Tres Monjitas, Inc. v. Wiscovitch-Rentas (In re PMC Marketing, Corp.)District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API