Legal Opinion

Radonich v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1932No. 6,909PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

Plaintiff, while employed by defendant as an underground miner, sustained injuries to his left leg on August 5, 1929, which arose out of and in the course of his employment. Defendant was operating under plan 1 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Rev. Codes 1921, sees. 2816 et seq., as amended). On September 25 plaintiff filed a claim for compensation with the Industrial Accident Board. Defendant paid compensation of $15 per week for a period of twenty-four weeks, or up to January 20, 1930, and nothing since then. On February 11, 1930, plaintiff filed his petition with the Industrial Accident…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. Roundup Coal Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Inland Steel Co. v. LambertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Moffett v. Bozeman Canning Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Yurkovich v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Stordahl v. Rush Implement CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Shugg v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Rom v. Republic Coal Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API