Pischke Et Vir. v. Dormont Boro.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Stadtfeld, J.,
Catherine B. Pischke and Max J. Pischke, her husband, brought suit in trespass against the Borough of Dormont, defendant, which brought upon the record by writ of scire facias, as additional defendants, South Pittsburgh Water Company and Magdalena Bold, the property-owner. This suit was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by Mrs. Pischke in a fall on the sidewalk in front of the premises 1495 Park Boulevard, Dormont Borough, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, on the evening of October 3, 1940, between eleven and eleven-fifteen o’clock.
The jury…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- German v. McKeesport City (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Burns v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Davis v. PotterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- McGlinn v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Reddington v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harrison Et Vir. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Bosack v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Brady v. Philadelphia (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Alston v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2010
- Dudley v. Feldman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.