Legal Opinion

Widincamp v. McCall

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 2, 1920No. 11635PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Trover from Tattnall superior court — Judge Sheppard. May 1, 1920.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

1. The court did not err in admitting, over the objection that it was hearsay, the testimony of a witness as follows: “I went to the Bluff to carry one load of cotton and I found out that cotton was worth more in Eeidsville that same day, and I went back that evening and I told Mr. Bdd that night.” The real purport of the testimony of the witness was that he went to Eeidsville and, after an investigation, found out that the market price of cotton on that date, the date of the alleged sale from the plaintiff to the defendant, was higher than the defendant had represented to the plaintiff.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Minchew v. Nahunta Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  2. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schoolcraft v. DeKalb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Chalker v. RaleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Cowart & SonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  4. Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. HathcoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  5. Schoolcraft v. DeKalb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API