Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Haney

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 25, 1966No. 2 Div. 486PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

Plaintiff-appellant sued defendant-appel■lee for damages on account of -injuries sustained in a hunting accident. Count 1 of the complaint charged simple negligence and Count 2 charged wantonness. The verdict and judgment were for the defendant and plaintiff appealed.

Appellant’s first argued assignment of error is that the court erred in giving the following requested written Charge No. 8 at the request of the appellee:

“I charge you, Gentlemen of the Jury, that the injury sustained by the Plaintiff, does not of itself give Plaintiff a right of recovery. To enable Plaintiff to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McNeil v. Munson S. S. LinesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Lewis v. ZellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Graves v. WildsmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  4. Taylor v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  5. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. KimbrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cooper v. WattsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  2. Water Works & Sanitary Sewer Board of the City of Montgomery v. NormanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. City of Fairhope v. RaddcliffeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  4. Gilmer v. SalterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  5. Chambers v. CulverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API