Legal Opinion · Dissent

Grindle v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation Division

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1986No. 85-249Published

1DissentUrbigkit, Justice

This court incorrectly affirms the trial court’s finding that the accident of February 15, 1984 constituted a readily apparent injury, in disregard of the additional requirement for knowledge of compensability first established for Wyoming Worker’s Compensation law by Baldwin v. Scullion, 50 Wyo. 508, 62 P.2d 531, 108 A.L.R. 304 (1936).

This court has consistently held “that the Worker’s Compensation Act should receive a liberal construction to accomplish the benevolent purposes for which it was promulgated.” In re Barnes, Wyo., 587 P.2d 214, 218 (1978); Mor, Inc. v. Haverlock, Wyo., 566 P.2d…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. ScullionWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Wheeler v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Mor, Inc. v. HaverlockWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Bemis v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Bemis v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API