Legal Opinion

Honeycutt v. Foster

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 29, 2007No. 07-665PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corjbin, Justice.

This appeal arises from the stiCounty ce. Court’s order denying Appellant Gregory Honeycutt’s petition and amended petition for writ of mandamus directed at Appellee Ouachita County District Court Judge Phillip Foster (referred to as the “District Court”), as well as the circuit court’s order granting Honeycutt’s motion to voluntarily nonsuit his petition for writ of prohibition and denying his motion for additional ruling and for new trial/reconsideration/relief from order. On appeal, Honeycutt raises two arguments for reversal: the circuit court (1) improperly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ball v. Phillips County Election CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. REPUBLICAN PARTY OF GARLAND CTY. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Barnett v. HowardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Terry v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. WARREN WHOLESALE CO. v. McLane Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Wilson v. WaltherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  4. City of Clinton v. Southern Paramedic Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Henson v. WyattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API