Isaacson v. Mayes
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Paul A Isaacson, et al., No. CV-21-01417-PHX-DLR 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Mark Brnovich, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 At issue is A.R.S. § 1-219—known in this case as the “Interpretation Policy”— 17 which provides: 18 A. The laws of this state shall be interpreted and construed to acknowledge, on behalf of an unborn child at every stage of 19 development, all rights, privileges and immunities available to other persons, citizens and residents of this state, subject only 20 to the Constitution of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.