Legal Opinion
People v. Maharaj
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 25, 1997PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered on count two of the indictment.
Defendant was indicted for driving on a public highway with a blood alcohol level of .10 of one percentum or greater in contravention of the per se limit set forth in Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2) (count one or the per se statutory count) and driving on a public highway while intoxicated, as that term has been defined in the common law, in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (3) (count two or the common-law count), and proceeded to trial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. GloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. AlfaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. GoodfriendNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. CunninghamNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. McNamaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. VegaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2000
- People v. HissinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. AgolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.