Emory University v. Lee
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
For the sake of clarity and convenience of expression the plaintiff in error, Emory University, will be referred to as the defendant, and the defendant in error, Clarence W. Lee, as the plaintiff, the parties having occupied those respective relations to the case in the trial court.
The defendant relies upon only one of the three general grounds of the motion for new trial, that the verdict was not supported by evidence.
The defendant contends, first, that its employees who were charged with the care of the plaintiff on the occasion when he was injured, according to the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Lefkoff v. SicroSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Pilgrim v. LandhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Childers v. Ackerman Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Emory University v. ShadburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Birkner v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Cowan v. DoeringSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Sims v. American Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Brandvain v. Ridgeview Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Swofford v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.