Legal Opinion

Teague v. Damascus

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided March 21, 1960No. 1798PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POWELL, Chief Judge.

This action was originally commenced by the plaintiff Richard Teague against certain defendants on March 11, 1959. An amended complaint was filed January 19, 1960, adding additional defendants, Helen Damascus, a widow, who was a resident of the State of Oregon, and Peter D. Lambros.and Demitra Lambros, husband and wife, who were residents of the State of Montana.

In the allegations of the amended complaint the plaintiff asserts that all of the defendants, including the defendants added in the amended complaint, were and are joint owners and operators of the real property…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Nelson v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Jacobus v. . ColgateNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Bernheimer v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Mladinich v. KohnMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People for Environmental Enlightenment & Responsibility (PEER), Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Gray v. ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Krueger v. Rheem Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API