Ashford v. Traylor
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. The rule of law permitting interest on past-due interest on a note which called for the payment of the principal at a fixed time, and the payment of interest at fixed times during the period that the principal is to run (Union Savings Bank v. Dottenheim, 107 Ga. 606, 614, 34 S. E. 217; Ray v. Pease, 97 Ga. 618, 25 S. E. 360; Scott v. Liddell, 98 Ga. 24, 29, 25 S. E. 935; Hadden v. Larned, 87 Ga. 634, 642, 13 S. E. 806; Butler v. First National Bank, 13 Ga. App. 35 (5), 78 S. E. 772), does not, in the absence of some express provision to the contrary, have application after the maturity of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Union Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. DottenheimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Hadden v. LarnedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Calhoun v. MarshallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
- Ray v. PeaseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Wofford v. WylySupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Byrd v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Dearing & Dearing Enterprises, Inc. v. A. R. III, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Bryant v. KenerlyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999