Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Ameritech Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 6, 1997No. 96-2067PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.

We have moved some distance from the days when an employee “sold his soul to the company store” when he was hired. Plaintiffs Thomas and Cynthia Schmidt may have thought otherwise, however, when defendant Ameriteeh Corporation decided to use its unique access to its Message Unit Detail, or MUD, records to investigate what Thomas was doing while he was on a leave of absence from his Ameriteeh job. Thomas and Cynthia began this suit for invasion of privacy in Cook County Circuit Court, but Ameriteeh removed it to federal court, claiming that Thomas’s claims were…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Livadas v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Michelle Brazinski v. Amoco Petroleum Additives Company and Buck IsbellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Ameritech IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. Schmidt v. Ameritech IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Schmidt v. Ameritech IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. Sullivan v. GelbDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  5. Thomas Schmidt v. Ameritech CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API