Legal Opinion

Krein v. Szewc

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 30, 2017No. 120553L2; A159610PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeVORE, P. J.

In this nuisance action, defendants appeal from a judgment awarding damages and entering an injunction. The injunction requires defendants to have their dogs undergo devocalization (“debarking”). Defendants assign error to the injunction, contending that plaintiffs failed to plead that they had no adequate remedy at law and that, in any event, damages suffice as an adequate remedy. Defendants also assign error to an order that granted plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment, contending that issues of fact precluded summary judgment. In particular, defendants contend that the court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. ELDRIDGE v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Lloyd Corporation v. WhiffenOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Eagles Five, LLC v. LawtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hoag Living Trust Dated Feb. 4, 2013 v. HoagCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. Nevius v. PalomaresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API