Legal Opinion

Michak v. Transnation Title Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 14, 2001No. 25589-8-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

In this title insurance case, the issue is whether the insurer could change its preliminary commitment without telling its insured. The answer is no. Thus, we reverse the trial court’s summary dismissal of the insured’s complaint.

In the early 1990s, Brent C. Hart1 owned a 40-acre tract of land in Kitsap County. He obtained ingress and egress by means of two easements, each 30 feet wide, that traversed servient tracts to the west. One easement was recorded under auditor’s file number 7804180111, and the other was recorded under auditor’s file number 7804180112. Each easement adjoined the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Hansen v. FriendWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Michak v. Transnation Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Michak v. Transnation Title Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API