Legal Opinion

Leake v. New York Cent. R. Co.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided January 26, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, District Judge.

This is a motion by the defendant to compel the plaintiff to give security for costs.

It appears by the complaint that the plaintiff is a resident of Virginia and defendant is a resident of this district.

It is conceded that the new civil practice rules of the Federal Court, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, do not cover the matter of requiring non resident plaintiffs to give security for costs.

It appears, however, that such has long been the practice in equity cases in the Federal Court. It was so held in Winkley Co. v. Bowen Mfg. Company et al., C.C.N.Y., 180 F. 624;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Long v. StitesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  2. Karns v. W. L. Imlay Rapid Cyanide Process Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Winkley Co. v. Bowen Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cary v. HardyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1940
  2. Oppenheimer v. F. J. Young & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  3. Slusher v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1943
  4. Sutton v. Great Lakes Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API