Legal Opinion

Linch v. Linch

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1945No. 31874PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

Suit was brought upon a promissory note. The answer alleged that the cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations, and, in addition, included a cross-petition setting up a counterclaim. Jury was waived, trial was had to the court, and judgment was entered for plaintiff in the sum of $11,438.35. Motion for new trial being overruled, defendant appealed to this court.

The plaintiff filed petition October 29, 1941, alleging that defendant executed his promissory note for $16,082.93, with 7 per cent interest from date, on January 1, 1932, said note being payable upon demand. In said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fritzler v. KeithleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Price v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Blair v. Estate of WillmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Kienke v. HudsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Younglove v. LiebhardtNebraska Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Master Boat Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Thomas v. Marvin E. Jewell & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Fleischer v. BrodersNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Broadmoor Realty, Inc. v. First Nationwide BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Jones v. Sageeyah Development, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API