Legal Opinion

Hicks v. J. B. Pearce Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1909No. Calendar No. 23,552PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Bill by Wilson H. Hicks and another against the J. B. Pearce Company and another to restrain a sale on the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage: On motion to dismiss an appeal from a decree dismissing the bill.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from a decree of the court below dismissing the complainants’ bill. The defendant Pearce held a mortgage upon personal property. The defendant Whitney was the agent of the Pearce Company. On the 20th of December, 1907, Whitney, acting for the company, took possession of the property covered by the chattel mortgage, and appraised the same, and proceeded to advertise the sale thereof. Complainants thereupon filed this bill to restrain the sale; that being the sole purpose of the bill. A temporary restraining order was issued; but a motion was immediately…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Street Railroad v. WildmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anway v. Grand Rapids Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Gildemeister v. LindsayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Tierney v. Union School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. North Laramie Land Co. v. HoffmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Crawford v. LeFevreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API