Fitch v. Cornell
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
DEADY, District Judge.
This action was commenced April 1C, 1869, to recover the j possession of lots 3, 4, 5 and 6, in block 111, i in the city of Portland, against George W. ] Durand, then in the actual possession of the ' premises. The complaint alleges that the ¡ plaintiff is a citizen of the state of Califor- j nia, and said Durand is a citizen and resident i of Oregon; that plaintiff is the owner in ! fee-simple of the property sued for, and en- ! titled to the immediate possession thereof; and that the defendant Durand is wrong- ; fully in possession of the same and withholds i such…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cline v. ClineMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 1871
3Cited by8 opinions
- Piatt v. PiattIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
- Hoover v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Anderson v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Raymond v. MorrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.