Legal Opinion

Raymond v. Morrison

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1894No. 1264PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Thurston County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

— To a complaint in ejectment the defendants set up in their answer that they were tenants in common, in sole possession of the land in controversy, with the devisees of Joseph Y. Pomeroy, and prayed that the plaintiffs be required to make the executor and devisees of Pomeroy parties defendant, and that the action be stayed until this should be done. The court held that Pomeroy’s devisees were necessary and proper parties to the action, and required the plaintiffs to bring them in, which was done over the objection of the plaintiffs.

While…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sharon v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Nelson v. BrodhackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  3. Baer v. ChoirWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Fitch v. CornellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1870
  5. Wythe v. MyersU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1876

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rogers v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Smith Sand & Gravel Co. v. CorbinWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Woll v. CostellaIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Garbarino v. NoceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Northern Counties Investment Trust, Ltd. v. EnyardWashington Supreme Court · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API