Legal Opinion

Riebe Well Drilling, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 5, 1994No. 92-36903Published

1Opinion of the Court

24 F.3d 248

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

RIEBE WELL DRILLING, INC., a Washington corporation,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-36903.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 10, 1994.

Decided May 5, 1994.

Before: HUG, HALL and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM*

OVERVIEW

2

Riebe Well Drilling, Inc.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Lois Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Egede-Nissen v. Crystal Mountain, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Tanguma v. Yakima CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  5. Bullock v. Yakima Valley Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API