Legal Opinion
Levey v. Jamison
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 4, 1938No. 4200PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOPER, Circuit Judge.
Upon the former appeal in this case (4 Cir., 82 F.2d 958), it was held that the evidence did not justify a directed verdict for the insured under the bond issued by the surety and the case was remanded for a new trial. Therein certain deficiencies in the evidence were supplied, and in effect a verdict for the insured was again directed. This action, we think, was erroneously taken, although we do not suggest that no liability exists on the part of the surety.
The bond is denominated a banker’s blanket bond for private bankers and stock*811brokers. It was issued in the sum of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harris v. National Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Earl v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Rath v. Indemnity Insurance of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Levey v. JamisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Schluter, Green & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- Kerr v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- R. Emmett Kerr, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for National Discount Corporation v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Charles W. Gambrell, Receiver for National Fidelity Insurance Company, Intervenor v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Charles W. Gambrell, Receiver for Cudd and Coan, Underwriters, Inc., Intervenor, in No. 9973, in No. 9974 v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, in No. 9973, in No. 9974. Charles W. Gambrell, Receiver for Title Insurance and Guaranty Company, Intervenor v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965