Legal Opinion

State v. Mills

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 10, 1997No. 37408-7-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

On RALJ appeal, the superior court affirmed Susan Mills’ sentence for driving while under the influence. In seeking discretionary review of that decision, Mills requested and was denied the appointment of counsel and preparation of a written verbatim report of the district court proceedings at public expense. We grant review of the court’s denial and hold an indigent RALJ petitioner has no right to appointed counsel or district court transcripts. We deny review of Mills’ challenges to her sentence.

Procedural History

The State cited Mills for driving while under the influence in August 1992. In…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Westerman v. CaryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. MahoneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  3. City of Richland v. KiehlCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  4. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  5. State v. DevlinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API