Johnson (Quinal) v. State

not be disturbed on appeal where, as here, substantial evidence supports the verdict. See Bolden v. State, 97 Nev. 71, 73,

624 P.2d 20, 20

(1981); see also McNair, 108 Nev. at 56, 825 P.2d at 573. Second, Johnson argues that the district court erred in instructing the jury. Specifically, he contends that Instruction 14, which combined the definition of express and implied malice, instructed the jury that it could convict him of attempted murder based on implied malice. We discern no plain error. See Saletta v. State, 127 Nev. _„

254 P.3d 111, 114

(2011) (providing failure to object at trial…