Legal Opinion

State v. Tawian Bacome(075953)

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 31, 2017No. A-9-15PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Timpone

In this appeal, we clarify the circumstances under which police officers may require a passenger in an automobile to exit a vehicle after a valid stop.

We underscore that the heightened-caution standard we announced in State v. Smith, 134 N.J. 599, 618-20, 637 A.2d 158 (1994), remains the proper test for determining the appropriate ness of ordering a passenger from a car. Under the Smith test, we hold that defendant’s furtive movements inside a recently stopped vehicle provided an objectively reasonable basis for officers’ exercising heightened caution, justifying removal of the passenger.

I

In…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. State v. EldersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. State v. Lurdes Rosario (077420) (Monmouth and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
  3. State v. Dwight M. Nelson a/k/a Nelson Dwight (080612)(Union County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2019
  4. Commonwealth v. LongMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2020
  5. STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. AHMAD J. MUHAMMAD (17-07-0820, 18-05-0743, AND 18-05-0744, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API