Pride v. Lamberg
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Commissioner.
This is an action to recover $25,000 actual and $25,000 punitive damages for alleged malicious prosecution. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the trial court sustained the defendants’ motion for judgment and the plaintiff appeals from the ensuing judgment of dismissal.
It is necessary at the outset to make the observation that the appellant designates and presents her action as one for malicious prosecution, and the respondents, as well as the plaintiff, have indiscriminately cited both false imprisonment and malicious prosecution cases. Coffman v. Shell Petroleum…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Snider v. WimberlySupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
- Walton v. Van CampSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Harper v. St. Joseph Lead Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Coffman v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1934
- Hunter v. KarchmerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Rustici v. WeidemeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Palermo v. CottomMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- In Re Estate of MapesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Gold Ex Rel. Gold v. HeathSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Matter of Estate of VivianoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.