Legal Opinion

McGhee v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 7, 2003No. CA CR 02-353PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wendell L. Griffen, Judge.

Appellant appeals the application of the seventy-percent parole-eligibility rule to his sentence for manufacture of a controlled substance, methamphetamine. Appellant argues that application of the rule to his sentence violated both the federal and state constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws because his crime was committed before methamphetamine offenses became subject to the seventy-percent rule. We affirm because appellant failed to preserve his argument for appellate review.

In 1998, appellant was arrested and charged with a number of offenses…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wicks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Bowen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Bosnick v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Nooner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Croston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Handy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  3. Croston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  4. McBride v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API