Legal Opinion

Croston v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 3, 2006No. CA CR 05-881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andree Layton Roaf, Judge.

Appellant Detrick Croston was found guilty of two counts of forgery in the second degree by a jury and sentenced to nine years’ imprisonment. Croston now argues on appeal that the trial court erred (1) in requiring him to wear prison attire during his trial; and (2) in allowing the State to introduce evidence of incriminating statements he made to Bailiff Art Noel. We affirm.

On November 24, 2003, Croston was charged with two counts of forgery in the second degree. Wal-Mart security cameras recorded Croston entering the store and handing a cashier a check that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Nooner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Holloway v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. United States v. Humberto MartinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Box v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Croston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Drake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Drake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API