Legal Opinion

Huikari v. Eeastman

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided July 1, 1966No. 11011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

This is an action of contract and tort in four counts, seeking to recover the cost of certain cranberries sold by the appellant to the appellee who in turn sold them to the C & E Canning Company of Hammonton, New Jersey. It was tried with a cross-action No. 11,045 Eastman v. Huikari, decided by us this day.

The declaration alleges that the apppellee was acting as a commission agent in the sale of the cranberries to the said C & E Canning Company; that the greater part of the berries sold to the C & E Canning Company were raised by the appellant; that due to the fact that the appellant had used…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moss v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Kelsey v. Hampton Court Hotel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  3. M. DeMatteo Construction Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. Spencer v. Robert Lawrence, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  5. Drury v. HartiganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Menotomy Realty Corp. v. FrenchMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1974
  2. Eastman v. HuikariMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API