Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re of Lock

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2001No. 99-0976Published

1Dissent

Justice OWEN, joined by Justice HECHT,

dissenting.

Today the Court has overruled its prior determination that compulsory discipline applies when a lawyer is convicted of a felony for possession of cocaine. Apparently, the Court now deems the disciplinary rules too harsh. But the rules must be applied as they are currently written. If the Court believes that there should be greater discretion in dealing with an attorney convicted for felony possession of a controlled substance, then the Court should observe established procedures for amending the disciplinary rules.

The consequences of today’s…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Matter of HumphreysTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Matter of RivkindArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In Re BerkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API