Legal Opinion

Butler County Bar Ass'n v. Derivan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1998No. 97-2259PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

We have reviewed the record and adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. However, we believe a more severe sanction is warranted. This case involves more than respondent’s negligence in failing to file a case within the appropriate statute of limitations. Respondent deliberately manufactured a document to exonerate himself and presented it as genuine in a formal disciplinary proceeding. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. FidlerOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. FidlerOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. Maney.Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v. DerivanOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Butler County Bar Ass'n v. DerivanOhio Supreme Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API