Manalansan v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.
We undertake the consideration of this appeal with the mental set still intact that we first articulated in Dixon v. State, 23 Md. App. 19, 20-21, 327 A.2d 516, to the effect that "no aspect of Fourth Amendment litigation has afflicted law enforcement with the yawning credibility gap wrought by inventory searches.”
We begin with the bedrock proposition that the inventorying of the contents of an automobile is not a constitutionally-permitted investigative technique. A search for evidence within an automobile may only be undertaken pursuant to a validly issued search and seizure warrant,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fair v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. GoffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- Ex Parte BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- State v. RothSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.