Legal Opinion

Sunderland v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 5, 1923No. 6121PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRIEBER, District Judge.

The United States instituted this action to cancel and set aside three leases and a conveyance of 3-60 acres of land, made to appellant by Nathaniel Perryman, a half-blood citizen of the Creek Nation of Indians, properly enrolled, and also a decree of the superior court of Tulsa county, state of Oklahoma, rendered by default against Nathaniel Perryman, which quieted appellant’s title to the premises sued for in this action.

The material allegations in the complaint are that Perryman, a half-blood citizen of the Creek Nation of Indians, properly enrolled, had allotted to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Lone Wolf v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Matter of HeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Bowling & Miami Investment Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sunderland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  3. United States v. MummertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. McElroy v. PeggCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  5. Hass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API