Legal Opinion

Hass v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1927No. 7499PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRIEBER, District Judge.

This is an action by the United States, on behalf of Lee Perry, a five-eighths blood Chickasaw Indian, against Mattie Hass. F. D. Hass, her husband, was made a party defendant on motion of Mattie Hass (and others, who defaulted, evidently not considering themselves affected by the decree), to cancel and declare void certain deeds of conveyance, mortgages, and leases to 40 acres of land, and to cancel and set aside a decree of the District Court of Pontotoc county, Oklahoma, rendered in pursuance of the mandate of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma between the defendants, F.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. CandelariaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Sunderland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  4. United States v. LawCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
  5. Hecht & Imboden v. CaughronSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McElroy v. PeggCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  2. Clinkenbeard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  3. Tyronza Special School Dist. v. SpeerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  4. Fox Film Corp. v. GrossDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1932
  5. United States v. WatasheDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API