Legal Opinion

Pritchett v. Sheridan

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1902No. 4,179PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Fountain Circuit Court; J. M. Babb, Judge. Action by Ellen Sheridan against James A. Pritchett and wife on a promissory note, and to foreclose a mortgage. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The appellee, Ellen Sheridan, sued upon a promissory note for $2,537.86 given her by the appellant, James A. Pritchett, while unmarried, and to foreclose a mortgage on land executed by him to her at the same time to secure the payment of the note. He having thereafter married, his wife was made a defendant, and with him she appeals. There was an answer in denial, with other paragraphs of answer, in which it was pleaded, in various forms, as a defense, and also as a partial defense, that the note and mortgage, as to $1,000 of the amount thereof, were given in consideration only of money won…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. Calumet River Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Pierce v. GoldsberryIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Doan v. DowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Broyles v. State ex rel. DeLongIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Wisconsin Planing Mill Co. v. SchudaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Satterblom v. WassonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Miller v. Farmers State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API