Legal Opinion

Miller v. Farmers State Bank

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1912No. 7,715PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Boone Circuit Court; James B. Kent, Special Judge. Action by the Farmers State Bank against Matthew G. Miller. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Suit by appellee against appellant alone on a promissory note for $1,300, payable to appellee, bearing the names of Joseph S. Miller and appellant, Matthew G-. Miller. Issue of fact was formed on the complaint by plea of non est factum. Trial by the court, finding and judgment for appellee.

1. 2. The error assigned and relied on for reversal is that the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial. The question presented for determination by the record and briefs relates to the execution of the note. It is not contended by appellee that appellant actually signed his name to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Indiana Union Traction Co. v. KeiterIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Beatty v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Stockwell v. WhiteheadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Pritchett v. SheridanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Bank of AdvanceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Miller v. HogshireIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Miller v. MelletteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Page v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Wocher v. HollandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API