Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Substitute for House Bill No. 2492

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1989No. 63,750PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, C J.:

This is an original action commenced by Robert T. Stephan, the attorney general of the State of Kansas, to determine the validity of Substitute for House Bill No. 2492 (L. 1989, ch. 8), enacted by the 1989 Kansas Legislature. The bill reapportions the state representative districts and repeals the statutes which formerly established such districts. For the reasons stated in this opinion, we find Substitute for House Bill No. 2492 valid legislation.

This action is brought pursuant to Article 10, Section 1 of the Constitution of Kansas, which…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. White v. RegesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Gaffney v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Brown v. ThomsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re StephanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. In re StovallSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  3. In re StovallSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2002
  5. In re Validity of Substitute for Senate Bill 563Supreme Court of Kansas · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API