Legal Opinion

Leytham v. Hassett

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 25, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

I. The case presented by the plaintiff is novel in its conception of legal right. The contract sued on was entered into on June 22, 1920, between the plaintiff, as vendor, and Patrick Hassett, as vendee. The plaintiff agreed thereby to sell to Hassett a farm of 367 acres, for $110,025. $1,000 of the purchase price ‘it tt , ,n , • ,, was paid by Hassett at the time ot the execution of the contract. Another payment of $2,000 was required to be paid in the ensuing October, and the same was so paid by Hassett. $20,000 was to be paid on March 1, 1921. Other payments were to be distributed over a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anfenson v. BanksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  2. Byington v. StoneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  3. Bowman v. Chicago, St. Paul. & Kansas City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  4. First National Bank v. ShriverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. Davis v. KimballSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. United Vaccines, Inc. v. Diamond Animal Health, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2006
  3. Leytham v. McHenrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API