Action Ads, Inc. v. Judes

RAPER, Justice, Retired,

concurring.

I am in concurrence with the majority opinion. The only purpose of this opinion is to enlarge upon that of the majority.

This court has already decided that:

“The law is clear that a broker or agent who, with a view to compensation for his *313services, undertakes to procure insurance for another and through fault or neglect fails to do so, will be held liable for any damage resulting. His liability arises under the concept that he is agent for the insured in negotiating for a policy and owes a duty to his principal to exercise reasonable skill, care and diligence…