Legal Opinion

Pham v. Smithfield Foods

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 2025No. 30859Published

1Opinion of the Court

#30859-r-MES

2025 S.D. 41

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** JODY PHAM, Claimant and Appellee, v. SMITHFIELD FOODS, SIOUX FALLS, Employer, Self-Insurer, and Appellant. **** APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MINNEHAHA COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA **** THE HONORABLE DOUGLAS E. HOFFMAN Judge **** LAURA K. HENSLEY KRISTIN N. DERENGE of Boyce Law Firm, LLP Sioux Falls, South Dakota Attorneys for employer, self- insurer, and appellant. DAVID J. KING BRENDAN F. PONS of King Law Firm, P.C. Sioux Falls, South Dakota Attorneys for claimant and appellee. **** ARGUED…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hanson v. Penrod Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Hayes v. Rosenbaum Signs & Outdoor Advertising, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Darling v. West River Masonry, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Whitney v. AGSCO DAKOTASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API