Legal Opinion

Hanneman v. Richter

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 24, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On demurrer.

1Opinion of the Court

Mache, Chancellor.

The bill in this ease- was filed by Louis Hanneman as the surviving husband of Amanda Hanneman, deceased, nee Ludemann,. and by Elsie Louise Hanneman, the sole heir-at-law of the said Amanda Hanneman, deceased.

One purpose of the bill is the partition of lands in the county of Hudson.

The bill charges that the lands in question belonged to one-*366Henrietta Ludemann, who died in January, 1878, leaving a will which is set out in full in the bill. Complainants claim that the testatrix thereby devised the lands in question to her two daughters, viz., Amanda, who became the wife of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of ShortNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Klein's EstateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. Meeker v. CampbellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API