Legal Opinion

Meeker v. Campbell

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 30, 1929Published

1Opinion of the Court

The bill is for partition of lands of which Elizabeth S. Campbell died seized, among her three children and a child of a deceased son. Mrs. Campbell had no children by her second husband, William S. Campbell. He is made a party defendant as administrator of his deceased wife's estate, presumably because he collected rents. He is also a defendant individually. He is not a proper party to the suit in either capacity. He had no issue by his wife, and consequently has no curtesy in the land. Nor has he an estate under the act of 1926 (P.L. p. 77), which provides that husband and wife inherit from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hanneman v. RichterNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1901
  2. Dewitt v. AckermanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1865
  3. Manners v. MannersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1841

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API