Legal Opinion

Williams v. Bitner

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 22, 2005No. CIV.A.1:01-CV-2271PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CONNER, District Judge.

Presently before the court is a motion for summary judgment by defendants, employees and officials of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections. They argue that plaintiff Henry Williams (‘Williams”), an inmate at a Pennsylvania corrections institution, has offered insufficient evidence to sustain his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of his rights to free exercise of religion, protected by both the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000ce to 2000ec-5, and the First Amendment, and to due process of law,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Williams v. BitnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  2. Williams v. BitnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  3. Smith v. HaleyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2005
  4. Hetsberger v. Dept. of CorrectionsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  5. JACKSON v. IRWINDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API